Legal Opinion
Bowles v. American Distilling Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The following defendants severally move to dismiss the action because of improper venue and improper service of process: 1, Arthur C. Sullivan; 2, Ben Burk, Inc.; 3, Country Distillers Products, Inc.; 4, Joseph J. Sands.
The complaint is in three counts and ‘names twenty three defendants. The first count is for an injunction to restrain alleged violations of MPR 193 and MPR 445; and is brought under Section 205(a), Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(a). Jurisdiction is predicated on Section 205(c) of that Act.
The second count is for treble damages…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pickthall v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- AG Bliss Co. v. United Carr Fastener Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953