Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. City of Melrose

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 25, 1999No. 98-2011PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal implicates the delicate balance between the need of educational institutions to have a relatively unfettered hand in order to perform their core mission effectively and the rights of teachers (and aspiring teachers) freely to express themselves. On particular facts, the district court reconciled that balance against plaintiff-appellant Robert J. Hennessy. At the same time, the court rejected several other claims that Hennessy had brought. Hennessy now appeals. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In accord with the summary judgment standard, we limn the facts as hospitably…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Centro Medico Del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano De MelecioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Curran v. CousinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Parker v. Town of LexingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Davignon v. HodgsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API