Legal Opinion

Rachel Byer v. Nicole Jantz

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 28, 2026No. 1:25-cv-03742Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RACHEL BYER, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 1:25-cv-03742-JRR NICOLE JANTZ, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending now before the court are Defendant Nicole Jantz’s Motion to Dismiss at ECF No. 12 (the “Motion to Dismiss”), as well as Plaintiff Rachel Byer’s Motion for Expedited Hearing on Replevin Claim at ECF No. 13 (the “Motion for Hearing”), and Motion Requesting Court to Waive Local Rule 102.2(a) Requirement for the Complaint to List Plaintiff’s Address at ECF No. 2 (the “Motion to Waive Address Requirement”). The court has…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API