Legal Opinion

State v. Huston

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 2000No. C3-00-725PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Randall Orion Huston challenges his sentence under the “career-offender statute.” He argues that he does not have the five “prior felony convictions” required by that statute. We agree and reverse the departure.

FACTS

Appellant has a lengthy felony record for property crimes, including one 1996 conviction (theft), three 1999 convictions (motor-vehicle theft, forgery, and attempted theft), and two January 2000 convictions (motor-vehicle theft and third-degree burglary).

Later in January 2000, appellant pleaded guilty to an additional felony offense: theft. On this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State of Minnesota v. Evan James FasthorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Raheem Michael KemokaiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API