State v. Huston
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant Randall Orion Huston challenges his sentence under the “career-offender statute.” He argues that he does not have the five “prior felony convictions” required by that statute. We agree and reverse the departure.
FACTS
Appellant has a lengthy felony record for property crimes, including one 1996 conviction (theft), three 1999 convictions (motor-vehicle theft, forgery, and attempted theft), and two January 2000 convictions (motor-vehicle theft and third-degree burglary).
Later in January 2000, appellant pleaded guilty to an additional felony offense: theft. On this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State of Minnesota v. Evan James FasthorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Raheem Michael KemokaiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002