Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

(PC) Flow-Sunkett v. T. Redmon

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 16, 2023No. 1:21-cv-01137Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLENN SUNKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01137-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY 13 v. WITH A COURT ORDER1 14 T. REDMON and T. BOERUM, (Doc. No. 32) 15 Defendants. SEPTEMBER 15, 2023 DEADLINE 16 17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is the third amended pro 18 se civil rights complaint filed under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

by Glenn Sunkett—a prisoner. (Doc. No. 19 32, “TAC”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court strikes Plaintiff’s TAC.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Joseph Nevijel v. North Coast Life Insurance Co., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Eric Knapp v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API