Legal Opinion
United States of America, Appellee-Appellant v. David Klapholz and Paula Klapholz, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 21, 1956No. 23596_1PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Circuit Judge.
These are cross appeals from an order of Judge Weinfeld in the Southern District of New York, granting in part and denying in part motions of the defendants to suppress evidence pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. The opinion of the District Court is reported at 17 F.R.D. 18.
The defendants, who had been arrested in the Eastern District of New York at 4:00 p. m., on August 2, 1954, but whose arraignment had been deferred until August 4,1954 at 1:00 p. m., moved to suppress all evidence obtained during and by reason of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MusiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Clayborne Bynum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- John E. Adams v. United States of America, Ernest J. Stuckey v. United States of America, Melvin R. Roots v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.