Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Gomes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1974No. 11211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.

The appellant, Francis H. Griswold, appeals from the dismissal and denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in Pinal County Superior Court.

Appellant, in his petition for writ of habeas corpus, raised some 42 propositions in support of his position and enlarged the number on appeal. When the frivolous matters áre discarded and the remaining matters logically consolidated, the following questions are proper for consideration:

1. Was this case exclusively in the jurisdiction of the federal government because the • defendant-appellant was an American Indian?

2…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. McBratneySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. GriswoldArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Makah Indian Tribe v. Clallam CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivera-Sanchez v. CristDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993
  2. State v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API