Legal Opinion

Makah Indian Tribe v. Clallam County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1968No. 39013PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Will Rogers 1 once said that this country had never lost a war nor won a peace parley. Emerging victorious in a number of Indian wars, the United States parleyed and made numerous treaties with the Indian tribes and nations. Under the Treaty of 1855, 12 Stat. 939, the Makahs claim immunity on their reservation from personal property taxes. We think the Indians have won another parley.

Under the Treaty of 1855, the Makahs yielded their claims to the lands where they lived and roamed in exchange for a reservation on which to live, hunt, fish, plant and work. The Assessor of Clallam County now…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Alberty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  5. Ex parte MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Violet BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. St. Cloud v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
  4. Goforth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. State v. PerankUtah Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API