Legal Opinion
Resnick v. Resnick
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1991No. 85 Civ. 9026 (RJW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Herman Resnick (“Herman”) has moved to strike the jury demand contained in the Corrected Answer to the First Amended Complaint filed by defendant Irving Resnick (“Irving”). For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The facts giving rise to this most recent episode in the longstanding and bitter quarrel between the Resnick brothers have been fully documented in prior decisions of this Court, and need not be repeated here at length. 1
A. Factual Background
Herman and Irving jointly owned and operated…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Geren v. Quantum Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- McDonald v. Artcraft Electric Supply Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Smith v. Rochester Telephone Business Marketing Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Design Strategies, Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Sullivan v. LTV Aerospace and Defense Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.