Legal Opinion
Pritchard v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 15, 2019No. 20180946-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
2019 UT App 184
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MARTHA S. PRITCHARD, Petitioner, v. LABOR COMMISSION AND AUTOLIV, Respondents. Opinion No. 20180946-CA Filed November 15, 2019 Original Proceeding in this Court Michael Gary Belnap and Stony Olsen, Attorneys for Petitioner Mark R. Sumsion and Lori L. Hansen, Attorneys for Respondent AutoLiv Jaceson R. Maughn, Attorney for Labor Commission JUDGE DAVID N. MORTENSEN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES GREGORY K. ORME and DIANA HAGEN concurred. MORTENSEN, Judge: ¶1 Martha S. Pritchard asks us to conclude that she is entitled to workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- ABCO Enterprises v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Provo City v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Pinyon Queen Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissonUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Johnston v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Watson v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020