Legal Opinion

Fox Run 1 v. Springville City

District Court, D. Utah

Decided July 17, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00223Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH FOX RUN I, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Company, ORDER GRANTING [94] DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR Plaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Case No. 2:20-cv-00223-DBB-DBP CITY OF SPRINGVILLE, a Utah District Judge David Barlow municipality, Defendant. Before the court is Defendant City of Springville’s (“Springville”) Motion for Summary Judgment, which seeks to dispose of Plaintiff Fox Run I, LLC’s (“Fox Run”) federal constitutional claims.1 For the following reasons, the court GRANTS Springville’s motion. BACKGROUND This case arises…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API