Legal Opinion
Neidhardt v. D.H. Holmes Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 30, 1984No. Civ. A. Nos. 75-2395, 75-2769PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.
These consolidated Title VII cases are before the Court for the purpose of making a determination and express findings on the issue of whether defendant D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd. (Holmes) is entitled to attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k)1 and the applicable jurisprudence. For the reasons set forth below, we find that Holmes is entitled to such an award.
I. Course of Proceeding
These cases of alleged sexual discrimination were tried to the Court on the following claims of plaintiffs and intervenors, i.e., The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987