Legal Opinion
Claim of Conroy v. Rupert Fish Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The board found that in the course of claimant’s work of handling boxes of frozen fish, requiring him to go in and out of freezers continuously, he became disabled due to pneumonia; and that due “ to the cumulative effect of the claimant’s work and the nature of his employment and his condition, a quiescent tuberculosis was activated which caused him to become disabled from March 24, 1952”. It was found that the “ pneumonia and tuberculosis was [sic] an occupational disease ”. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Claim of Lesnik v. National Carloading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Claim of Lesnik v. National Carloading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Claim of Deyo v. Village of Piermont, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Berry v. Owensboro Ice Cream & Dairy ProductsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970