Legal Opinion
Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 20, 1984No. Civ. A. 3058 CMW, 83-567 CMWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
A ruling from this Court is once again required in this long and difficult patent litigation because several plaintiffs remain unable to agree on how money received as a result of this litigation should be distributed and on whether a claim for attorney’s fees should be honored. The TeGrotenhuis and Ziesenheim plaintiffs (hereinafter “T & Z”) have filed a complaint alleging that they are entitled to interest on various amounts received by them as a result of this litigation and that TeGrotenhuis is entitled to certain attorney’s fees.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Becker v. Huss Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Susan R. Lindsey v. M.A. Zeccola & Sons, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation M.A. ZeccolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Farris v. MoeckelDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- United States v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Chadwick v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Upjohn Co. v. Riahom Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.