Legal Opinion
Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 9, 2005No. 2004-1042PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Palm Bay Imports, Inc. (Palm Bay) appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) refusing registration of the mark VEUVE ROYALE for sparkling wine on the ground of likelihood of confusion with three of opposer Veuve Clicquot Ponsar-din’s (VCP’s) marks. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v. Palm Bay Imports, Inc., Opp’n No. 115,438, 2003 WL 21953664 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 4, 2003). This court concludes that the Board did not err in finding a likelihood of confusion, but substantial evidence does not support such a finding…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Scarves by Vera, Inc. v. Todo Imports Ltd. (Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- General Mills, Inc. v. Kellogg Company, Kellogg Company v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- Coach Services, Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. Lion Capital LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Juice Generation, Inc. v. Gs Enterprises LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Converse, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.