Legal Opinion

Whitesides v. ETrade Securities, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 11, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05803Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BENJAMIN WHITESIDES, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05803-JSC 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. AND TO STRIKE 11 E*TRADE SECURITIES, LLC, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Three users of E*TRADE’s electronic trading service bring suit alleging that E*TRADE 14 failed to process their orders as the crude oil futures market collapsed on April 20, 2020. 15 E*TRADE’s motion to dismiss and to strike is now pending before the Court.1 (Dkt. No. 17.) 16 Having carefully considered the parties’ briefs and having…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API