Legal Opinion

Havard v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2006No. 2003-DP-00457-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLSON, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. After a jury found Jeffrey Havard guilty of capital murder (murder during the commission of sexual battery) of six-month old Chloe Britt, the same jury found Havard should suffer the penalty of death. Consistent with the jury verdict, the trial judge imposed the death sentence upon Havard, and it is from this final judgment that Havard appeals to us. Finding no reversible error in the guilt/innocence phase, or the sentencing phase, we affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Adams County Circuit Court-

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THE TRIAL…

2Cases cited254 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Havard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API