Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 16, 2001No. CR. A. 94-381PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

BERRIGAN, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Government’s Motion to Reconsider Hybrid Representation. (Rec.Doc. 898). For the reasons explained below, the Motion is GRANTED. In light of this ruling, the Government’s Motion for a Mental Status Examination (Rec.Doc. 876) is DENIED AS MOOT.

The issue before the Court is who will determine and who will present Len Davis’ (“Davis”) defense at his upcoming sentencing hearing. The government contends that hybrid representation should be precluded and that Davis be either represented by counsel or proceed pro se, with standby…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API