Legal Opinion

Florida Citrus Commission v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 31, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, Circuit Judge.

The purpose of this suit is to set aside orders 1 of the Interstate Commerce Commission relating to unloading charges on fresh fruits and vegetables at New York and Philadelphia, entered pursuant to the Commission’s report on rehearing, dated May 7, 1952, 286 I.C..C. 119. See also 272 I.C.C. 648.

Plaintiffs are shippers of said commodities, and others interested in the marketing thereof. The Secretary of Agriculture of the United States intervened, as did also many marketing, transportation and terminal organizations, and public Commissions. The cause is submitted as on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Florida Citrus Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1956
  3. Feinstein v. New York Central Railroad Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. William N. Feinstein & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. William N. Feinstein & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API