State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The paramount question in this case is whether the amendment of Section 1465-90, General Code (111 Ohio Laws, 227), passed March 26, 1925, effective June 24, 1925, and in force at the time of filing his claim with the Industrial Commission, denies the relator a rehearing, which is the basis of his right to an appeal to the common pleas court, under said section, in the event of a denial of his claim.
The statute (109 Ohio Laws, 296), prior to the amendment, provided as follows:
"The commission shall have full power and authority to hear and determine all questions within its jurisdiction, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- Industrial Commission v. PembertonOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Butram v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Yance v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932