Legal Opinion

Stankic v. City of Sandusky, Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 29, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00080Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IGOR STANKIC, et al., CASE NO. 3:23-CV-00080-DAC Plaintiffs, MAGISTRATE JUDGE DARRELL A. CLAY vs. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER ON NORFOLK SOUTHERN CITY OF SANDUSKY, OHIO, et al., RAILWAY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE Defendants. PLEADINGS [ECF #31] INTRODUCTION This case is before me based on the parties’ joint consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF #20, 36). On December 14, 2023, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company filed a Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, seeking…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API