Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 5, 1932No. 33PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

By this appeal we are called on to decide whether as construed below a statute of North Dakota, c. 238, Laws 1919, is repugnant to the due process or equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It declares:

“Sec. 1. Reasonable Time to Discover Defects. Any person, firm or corporation purchasing any gas or oil burning tractor, gas or steam engine, harvesting or threshing machinery for their own use shall have a reasonable time after delivery for the inspection and testing of the same, and if it does not prove to be reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was purchased the purchaser…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API