Legal Opinion

Fry v. Feamster

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

cited 26 W. Va. 487;'2:3 Graft. 42; 16 Gratt. 855; 55 Am. Dec. 405. cited 2 Perr. Tr. §§ 828, 835, 836, et eeq.; Code, c. 13, s. 17 sub. div. 16 ; 4 Min. Inst. 1219 (t. p. 1356).

1Opinion of the Court

English, .Judge:

On the first Monday in February, 1890, Susan B. Fry, in her own. right and as trustee, filed her bill in the Circuit Court *455of Greenbrier county against Mary J. Feamster in her own right and as trustee, Annie, Maud, and Patsey Feamster> infant children of said Mary J. Feamster, Adelaide Huff-uagle, deceased, and Lucy, Lillie, and Joseph Fry, infant children of Susan 13. Fry, in which the plaintiff alleged that she and the defendant Mary J. Feamster were sisters — the daughters of Jacob and Adelaide Iluffnagle; — that the defendants Annie, Maud, and Patsey Feamster were infant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Handy v. Scott, Baker & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Boyd v. GunnisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Casto v. FryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Graham v. GrahamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hancock v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hartman v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Dewing v. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Foley v. RuleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cann v. Cann's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Mountain State Motor Car Co. v. SolofWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API