Francis v. Brooks
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Richards,- J.
The original action was commenced in the court of common pleas by Mrs. Brooks for the purpose of recovering damages claimed to have been suffered by reason of malpractice on the part of the defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in her favor for $12,500, and this judgment is now sought to be reversed.
The bill of exceptions discloses that Mrs. Brooks had been having trouble with some of her teeth, and had consulted a Dr. Bennett with reference to their removal. X-ray pictures were taken showing the teeth, and upon the X-ray plate Dr. Bennett marked nine teeth for…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of Leach v. ShapiroOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Patterson v. VincentSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
- Physicians' & Dentists' Business Bureau v. DrayWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Maercklein v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.