Legal Opinion
People v. Mateo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 2004Published
1Opinion of the Court
2 N.Y.3d 383 (2004)
811 N.E.2d 1053
779 N.Y.S.2d 399
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
ANGEL MATEO, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued January 14, 2004.
Decided February 24, 2004.
Kevin M. Doyle, Capital Defender, Albany (Barry J. Fisher, Beverly Van Ness and Andrew C. Shear of counsel), for appellant.
Howard R. Relin, District Attorney, Rochester (Wendy Evans Lehmann and Arthur G. Weinstein of counsel), for respondent.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Luke Martland, Peter B. Pope, Daniel Smirlock and Robin A. Forshaw of counsel), in his…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.