Legal Opinion
In Re Horton
California Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1991No. S012531PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 Cal.3d 82 (1991)
813 P.2d 1335
284 Cal. Rptr. 305
In re JAMES F. HORTON II on Habeas Corpus.
Docket No. S012531.
Supreme Court of California.
August 12, 1991.
COUNSEL
Altshuler & Berzon, Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Berzon & Rubin, Michael Rubin and Marsha S. Berzon for Petitioner.
John K. Van de Kamp and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorneys General, Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Marc E. Turchin, Susan L. Frierson and Joan Comparet, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.
OPINION
BROUSSARD, J.
The issue in this case is whether a court commissioner may conduct a trial in a capital…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015