Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Blackburn

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2015No. S211078Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.,

Concurring and Dissenting. — I concur in the statutory interpretation in parts I through III of the majority opinion. But I respectfully dissent from the remainder of the opinion concerning the standard of harmless error review applicable to the state law errors that occurred in this case and the proper application of that standard. Unlike the federal Constitution, which contains no provision addressing the subject of harmless error in a judicial proceeding, the California Constitution contains an explicit provision directed to that subject, providing that “[n]o judgment…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API