People v. Blackburn
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.,
Concurring and Dissenting. — I concur in the statutory interpretation in parts I through III of the majority opinion. But I respectfully dissent from the remainder of the opinion concerning the standard of harmless error review applicable to the state law errors that occurred in this case and the proper application of that standard. Unlike the federal Constitution, which contains no provision addressing the subject of harmless error in a judicial proceeding, the California Constitution contains an explicit provision directed to that subject, providing that “[n]o judgment…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.