Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. Doese

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1993No. 17838Published

1DissentWuest, Justice

I dissent as I believe the six-year statute of limitations on which the majority relies is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The issue in this case is not whether the eighteen-year statute of limitations should be given retroactive effect but whether the six-year statute of limitations on which Doese relies is valid. Although the issue of equal protection was not thoroughly briefed by Hove, Doese did allege a violation of the Equal Protection Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; therefore, I do not believe the issue is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Mills v. HabluetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API