Allen v. United Zinc Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.
The defendant in error brought an action against Allen on two promissory notes. Allen filed five pleas, four of which were excluded by demurrer. There was judgment for the plaintiff and on writ of error the defendant below, contends, that there was material error in sustaining the demurrer to the four pleas. The notes were given for subscription to corporate stock.
In effect the excluded pleas aver that the plaintiff represented to defendant that the plaintiff corporation was prosperous; that the plaintiff corporation had sold a large amount of stock to various persons and that it all had been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heathcote v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stokes v. Victory Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Simon v. Celebration Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Huffstetler v. Our Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Hart v. MarburySupreme Court of Florida · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.