Markel International Insurance v. Western PA Child Care, LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
In the instant case, Plaintiff Markel International Insurance Company (“Markel”) has filed a Complaint seeking a Declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the Defendants for any claims asserted in the Luzerne County Litigation in which the Defendants are involved.
A. The Underlying Case
The instant suit arises out of the following cases filed in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- NVR, INC v. MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- ROSENBERG v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022