Legal Opinion

Redgate

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 12, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The petitioner, James J. Redgate, requests that we hold unconstitutional his commitment as a sexually dangerous person (SDP) under G. L. c. 123A, § 6, as appearing *800in St. 1985, c. 752, § 1, to the treatment center at the Massachusetts Correctional Institution, at Bridgewater (treatment center). He argues that our decision in Commonwealth v. Arment, 412 Mass. 55, 62-63 (1992), controls. The Appeals Court held that the Arment decision renders his commitment unconstitutional. 35 Mass. App. Ct. 495, 498 (1993). We granted the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate review. We agree with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. DeJoinville v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. ArmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. LeBlanc v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RedgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API