Legal Opinion

Darnell v. Haines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1925No. 26,181PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for a money judgment on an unperformed express contract to pay for services by making a will of land. The defense now material was previous election of an inconsistent remedy. Plaintiff prayed for and recovered a sum measured by value of the land, and defendant appeals.

George Earl, an unmarried man, leased without reservation eighty acres of land to R. J. Darnell, who took possession and occupied the premises with his family. Earl made his-home with the tenant,, occupying a room in the dwelling house and taking his meals…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berry v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. James v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Wiley v. LockeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Pantel v. BowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Clifton v. MeuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. T. M. Deal Lumber Co. v. VieuxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Emanuel Home v. BerginSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. In Re Estate of FitzroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Curtis v. HannaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API