Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hagans

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 375PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

Again we are asked to decide whether a delay caused by a co-defendant is chargeable to appellant for purposes of computing the 180-day period in which a defendant must be brought to trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. On the basis of Commonwealth v. Brown, - Pa.Super. -, -, 364 A.2d 330, 332 (filed Sept. 27, 1976), where we held that “a delay caused by a co-defendant and not agreed to by a defendant cannot be charged to the defendant,” appellant’s judgment must be reversed.

A criminal complaint was filed against appellant, Edward Hagans, on January 8, 1975, charging him with burglary,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HicksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DunbarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. KearseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. MetzgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API