Keating v. Ferrandino
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Mark Ferrandino, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting his motion to modify child support payments to be made to the plaintiff, Meredith Keating. On appeal, the defendant claims, as well as we can discern, that in determining his child support obligations the court erred in (1) applying the child support guidelines, (2) failing to take into account his children from a previous marriage, (3) assessing the parties’ available net income and (4) failing to consider the plaintiffs earning capacity. Because the defendant’s brief is inadequate, we decline to…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. ToccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
4Cited by11 opinions
- Spearman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Worth v. KORTAConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Lucarelli v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Worth v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Lewis v. BowdenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.