Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Roe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; "Donovan, J. Trover by Herbert E. Boynton, assignee of F. G. Smith Sons & Co., against Charles Roe, Jr. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

In 1880 the corporation of M. S. Smith & Co. was organized with a capital stock of $75,000, *403divided into 3,000 shares of $25 each. M. S. Smith subscribed for 200 shares. The balance was divided among Frank G. Smith, E. J. Smith, John S. Wood, and defendant, Roe. Roe subscribed for 360 shares, giving his note to M. S. Smith for $9,000, and left his stock with Mr. Smith as collateral to the note. On this note, from time to time, he applied the dividends to which his stock was entitled, until he had paid $5,000, and had received from Mr. Smith certificates for 200 shares of the stock. Roe did…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Grant v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Chase v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  5. Brady v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re De Camp Glass Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  2. Sayre v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Brock v. PoorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. In re Russell Wheel & Foundry Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1915
  5. Goetz v. KnieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API