Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Lake Ka-Ho, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 7, 1981No. 16927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Webber
Defendants appeal an award in eminent domain. The sole contention is that the trial court erred in excluding testimony concerning siltation in a lake which is the centerpiece of defendants’ property. The overall project was the construction of Interstate Route No. 55 through Macoupin County.
Lake Ka-Ho Subdivision lies in section 34, township 8 north, range 6 west of the third principal meridian, Macoupin County. It is bordered on the south by Township Road 395 which runs east-west and on the east by Fellin Drive, a private roadway for the use of lot owners in the subdivision. The subdivision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Horn v. the City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. BloomerIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- County of Winnebago v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. HorejsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. RasmussenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- La Salle National Bank & Trust Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Lake Ka-Ho, Inc. v. KramerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. DickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Lake Ka-Ho, Inc. v. KramerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985