Dowse v. Kammerman

CROCKETT, Justice.

I dissent.

At the outset I concede: that the rule of caveat emptor applies to a purchaser taking a tax title; that a quitclaim deed carries no warranty of title, special or otherwise; that it does not convey to the grantee the benefit of any after-acquired title which may come into the hands of the grantor ; and further that facts are not present here which would make out the elements of an equitable estoppel against the plaintiff. See 19 Am. Jur. 642; 31 C. J. S., Estoppel, § 66, p. 254.-

Notwithstanding the foregoing, I think that under the facts of this case the plaintiff…