Legal Opinion
Cunliffe v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1998No. CIV.3:96CV01595(JBA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
ARTERTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff David Cunliffe, a Caucasian male, sued his former employer, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, charging that Sikorsky discriminated against him on the basis of his race. Mr. Cunliffe also charges that Sikorsky negligently inflicted emotional distress upon him. The case comes before the Court on a motion for Summary Judgment by the defendant, Sikorsky. [Doe. # 39]
In 1980, Mr. Cunliffe began working for Sikorsky as a shipping clerk in Sikorsky’s Meyers facility. Mr. Cunliffe maintained…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ticali v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BrooklynDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Seils v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Cully v. Milliman & Robertson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Barella v. Village of FreeportDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Berkowitz v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.