Lerman v. Levine
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBorden, J.
I concur with the majority regarding the appeal. I disagree, however, with the majority regarding the cross appeal. Therefore, I dissent and would find no error on the cross appeal.
I agree with the majority that under General Statutes § 52-404 (b) it is not necessary for a cotenant, who does not occupy the property in question, to establish ouster in order to be entitled to an accounting for a proportion of use and occupancy from her cotenant who occupies the property. An ouster is a wrongful and intentional exclusion from property of one who is entitled to its possession. Diamond v. Boynton,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Newell v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Vesce v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Struzinski v. StruzinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Neumann v. NeumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Zuch v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.