Legal Opinion
Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. R.E. Hazard
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 3, 2000No. Civ.A. 96-1079 SSHPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Washington, D.C., law firm, filed this lawsuit to recover unpaid attorney’s fees from several California defend ants. 1 Two of the defendants — Colleen Coffman (“Colleen”) and Coffman Specialties, Inc. (“Specialties”) — moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. On September 30, 1998, the Court deferred consideration of that motion pending an evidentiary hearing. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on February 12, 1999. Before the Court are four matters: (1) Colleen’s and Specialities’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Gonzalez v. Internacional De Elevadores, S.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Alkanani v. Aegis Defense Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.