Legal Opinion

Keenan v. McAdams & Cartwright Elevator Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for new trial. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

Although plaintiff failed to prove the specific acts of negligence alleged in his complaint, yet upon the trial *372counsel for the defendant Bloomingdale expresssly waived any objection upon that score. Plaintiff did proceed with his proof along the lines of his pleading so far as to make a case for the jury, in my opinion, under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The jury were warranted in finding that plaintiff refused to work near the machine which caused the accident unless it were stopped; that the chief engineer, the authorized representative of the defendant Bloomingdale, who had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keenan v. McAdams & Cartwright Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API