Legal Opinion

Keenan v. McAdams & Cartwright Elevator Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Samuel J. Bloomingdale, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 16tli day of March, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury for $6,250, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 21st day of March, 1908, denying the said defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

The defendant Bloomingdale appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The plaintiff was a steamfitter in the employ of one Frank Dobson, who was a sub-contractor under the McAdams & Cartwright Elevator Company. The latter firm held a contract with the defendant Bloomingdale to make certain alterations in the elevators in the large department store belonging to said Bloomingdale. The precise nature of these alterations is not disclosed by the evidence and is not important. It appears that it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Cassidy v. . UhlmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Duhme v. . Hamburg-American Packet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Keenan v. McAdams & Cartwright Elevator Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Courtney v. Gainsborough StudiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Keber v. Central Brewing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API