Legal Opinion
M.S. DOE v. COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 17, 2026No. 2:24-cv-02640Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 M.S. DOE, an individual, No. 2:24-cv-02640-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court are Defendant Brandon Compton and Defendant 19 County of Plumas’s Motions to Dismiss. Both Motions seek to dismiss several federal 20 causes of action in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. Defendant Compton seeks 21 to dismiss Plaintiff’s eighth, ninth and tenth causes of action as duplicative of Plaintiff’s 22 excessive force claim and/or for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.