Legal Opinion

Baker v. Gibson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1939No. Sac. 5084PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff brought suit to terminate a lease and to recover possession of a placer mining claim and equipment in Shasta County. The first count sought to recover the right of possession of the property. The second cause of action was for two instalments of rent alleged to be due, amounting to $850. The answer conceded the termination of the lease and disclaimed the desire to retain possession of the property by the defendants. It denied that instalments of rent were due or owing to plaintiff. In a counterclaim the defendants asked for judgment for $266.88 necessarily…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Riskas v. De La MontanyaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Estate of SobolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API