Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Trenton Housing Authority

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 30, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WECKER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiff James E. Hunter is the prevailing party in a civil rights action against the Trenton Housing Authority under federal and state law. Hunter appeals an order denying his application for attorney’s fees.

The issue before us is narrow: whether the Authority’s “good faith” or any “special circumstances” warrant the denial of attorney’s fees. Because we conclude that Hunter is entitled to an attorney’s fee under the federal and state statutes sued upon, we reverse and remand for determination of an appropriate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Northcross v. Memphis Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Singer v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Rabbi Samuel Teitelbaum, Larry and Louise Diehl v. Theodore Sorenson, Dba/waitwell Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. HIP v. K. Hovnanian at MahwahNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.H.R. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Dunn v. State, Dept. of Human ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. COMMITTEE OF TO PROTEST THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2016-01 VS. BOROUGH OF BELMAR (L-1392-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API