Rabbi Samuel Teitelbaum, Larry and Louise Diehl v. Theodore Sorenson, Dba/waitwell Nursing Home
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from a district court denial of an attorneys fees motion brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1976).
In March 1979, Appellant, a public interest law firm, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976) against Appellee, a nursing home operator. Appellant alleged that Appellee abridged Appellant’s First Amendment rights by refusing it access to residents at Appellee’s nursing home. Appellant obtained a permanent injunction directing Appellee to grant Appellant access to the facility. The district court, however, denied Appellant’s motion for attorneys fees, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ontiveros v. ZamoraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Wilson v. StockerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.