Legal Opinion

Rabbi Samuel Teitelbaum, Larry and Louise Diehl v. Theodore Sorenson, Dba/waitwell Nursing Home

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1981No. 79-3530PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a district court denial of an attorneys fees motion brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1976).

In March 1979, Appellant, a public interest law firm, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976) against Appellee, a nursing home operator. Appellant alleged that Appellee abridged Appellant’s First Amendment rights by refusing it access to residents at Appellee’s nursing home. Appellant obtained a permanent injunction directing Appellee to grant Appellant access to the facility. The district court, however, denied Appellant’s motion for attorneys fees, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Ontiveros v. ZamoraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. Wilson v. StockerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API