State ex rel. Haley v. Davis (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the Ninth District Court of Appeals’ denial of the petition for writs of prohibition. The trial court does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to make the rulings in this case and an appeal provides an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Therefore a writ of prohibition is inappropriate. In addition, we dismiss the appeal insofar as it challenges the court of appeals’ denial of a petition for a writ of procedendo, because the trial court’s entry of October 29, 2015, renders moot the request for a writ of procedendo.
Facts
{¶2} Appellant, Stephen T.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Ballard v. O'DonnellOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Grove v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Bell v. PfeifferOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pierre Invests., Inc. v. CLE Capital Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Teays Valley Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. StruckmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Askew v. Summit Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Knox v. GallagherOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Williams v. Natl. Assn. for the Advancement of Colored PeopleOhio Court of Appeals · 2023