Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2013No. 2012-1207PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an action for a writ of prohibition to prevent respondents, the Ohio Oil and Gas Commission and three of its five members, from exercising jurisdiction in an appeal from the issuance by the chief of the Ohio Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management of a permit to relator, Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. (“Chesapeake”), to drill an oil and gas well, and to vacate the commission’s actions in the appeal. Because the commission patently and unambiguously lacks jurisdiction over the appeal from the chiefs issuance of the permit, we grant the writ.

Facts

{¶ 2} In 2004, Summitcrest,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Sapp v. Franklin County Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Bell v. PfeifferOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Sanquily v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Elder v. Camplese (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. V.K.B. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. Trim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Claugus Family Farm, L.P. v. Seventh Dist. Court of Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Fiser v. Kolesar (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API