Legal Opinion

Com. of Pa. v. Rousch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1934No. Appeal 84PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, J.,

The defendant was secretary and treasurer of the now closed Wharton Title & Trust Company of Philadelphia. He was indicted for having subscribed, in his capacity as treasurer, to false written reports or statements of the financial condition of that company. The case came on for trial, when the following colloquy occurred between the attorney for the appellant and the court:

"Mr. Walsh:
"It is our understanding as counsel that under a plea of nolo contendere the questions of law and the evidence are for your Honor to decide.
"The court:
“I made an exhaustive study of it and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. HolstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Buck v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Warner v. WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Ferguson v. ReinhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API