Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. T & D Cottage Auto Parts & Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 22, 1983No. 81-3059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Chief Judge.

Supreme Auto Parts, Inc. (Supreme) appeals an order of the district court dismissing its counterclaims against Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Nationwide). This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976).

I

T & D Cottage Auto Parts & Service, Inc. (T & D) was insured for loss by fire under a policy issued by Nationwide. When NationWide refused to pay T & D’s claims resultihg from a fire on T & D’s premises, T & D brought an action in the district court. T & D and Nationwide settled this suit for $35,-000.

In a subsequent action, based on 28…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Thelma M. Wade, as Administratrix of the Estate of Russell L. Smith, Deceased v. Dan Rogala, Doing Business as Rogala FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John W. Curtis v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  3. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. T & D Cottage Auto Parts And Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Whiteford System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API